Thoughts about reading fiction, nonfiction, and children’s books, new and old
I disliked Three Cups of Tea; my mother loved it. Read our counterpoints.
I heartily disliked listening to the 800+ minute audiobook of Three Cups of Tea by David Oliver Relin.
To begin with, I disliked the horrible writing, which was full of extraneous details and parenthetical thoughts, as well as cheesy comparisons (”Mortenson sat on a boulder and drank from his water bottle until it was empty. But he couldn’t drink in enough of this setting.”). Or maybe my boredom stemmed from the never-ending tangents away from Greg’s Pakistan story (such as his girlfriend dumping him). Also, I disliked Three Cups of Tea because it read like a report, not a memoir. Despite Greg’s name on the cover, the story was in the third person. Recollections are told by a researcher (”he says, five years later” and “she says, her eyes filling with tears”). This journalistic approach to what could have been impressive made this story drier with each and every insignificant detail.
Ultimately, I disliked this book because of Greg Mortenson, who I failed to like for the beginning 600 minutes of narration. Yes, he was compassionate. But because he lacked common sense, to me he appeared to be a clueless loser with good luck.
In the early 1990s, middle-aged Greg worked part-time to save for climbing adventures. When Greg fails to summit K-2 and those in a remote village in Pakistan save his life, Greg promises to build them a school. In the USA, he lives in his car to save money. Not knowing how to use a computer or to fundraise the requisite $12,000, he typewrites letters to celebrities for months. Then he meets a wealthy scientist who not only funds Greg’s promised school but wills $1,000,000 to Greg in the form of a new Pakistan school-building humanitarian organization. But Greg is no business man: when funds get low, he chases possible donors across the USA, and his own employees quit because he disappears for weeks at a time without contact.
Back in Pakistan, Greg, who despite having funds still lacks common sense, does foolish things. For example, he buys building supplies before remembering he’d first need a bridge to get them to the village. In 1996, he was abducted by Taliban operatives because he traveled alone, despite advice not to. After 9/11, he goes to the Afghan border “just to see what will happen.” Despite his scatter-brained ways, he somehow succeeds in building schools, bridges, and women’s centers.
The story post-9/11 was slightly more interesting, and I learned much about Muslim-American relations from a new perspective. Greg’s attempts to rekindle peace in Pakistan and Afghanistan were applaudable, and I stopped disliking him as much. However, there is subtle comparison of Greg to Mother Teresa, which I still felt was inappropriate.
Greg has compassion on the uneducated of Pakistan, and he does promote peace towards the Muslim world post-9/11. The children of Pakistan certainly do need an education. But personally, I found Greg’s story uninspiring overall because, despite his obviously compassionate heart, Greg mostly seemed to lack common sense.
Ellen Sorenson has a Ph.D. in English and she teaches middle school English. She also happens to be Rebecca’s mother.
Sometimes we read a book to enjoy the perfection of the language; sometimes we are enthralled by the intricacies of the plot; and sometimes we are inspired by a story that must be told. Three Cups of Tea, by Greg Mortenson and David Oliver Relin was, for me,
such a story. I was reminded of a character in Alan Paton’s Cry the Beloved Country — a woman who, when thanked for her service responds, “what are we born for?” Surely Greg Mortenson knows what he was born for. Lost while climbing Pakistan’s treacherous K2, he wandered half-frozen into the remote village of Korphe, where the impoverished people nursed him back to health. Whereas other climbers had visited the village and never returned, Mortenson was determined to keep his promise to build a school for the people who had saved his life.
It was a promise he was supremely ill-equipped to keep. He was without adequate organizational skills, financial resources, or personal connections. Yet he somehow managed to raise the necessary $12,000 in America, purchase materials in Islamabad, and transport them through corruption, bureaucracy, and bands of roving militants nearly as challenging as the poorly developed mountain roads he had to navigate.
His one school in Korphe has been followed by dozens of others, in addition to pipelines and wells to bring fresh water to villages, women’s workshops and community centers, and health education. Education for girls is the single most important factor in reducing poverty, abuse, and child mortality in developing nations. For the boys of Pakistan, it provides an alternative to the Taliban-sponsored madrasahs, where hatred and violence are served along with three meals a day.
According to Haji Ali, Village Chief of Korphe, in Pakistan, “[we] drink three cups of tea to do business; the first you are a stranger, the second you become a friend, and the third, you join our family.” Reading Three Cups of Tea, I was reminded that I am a member of the human family. And though I have not shared a cup of tea with the people of a distant land, perhaps I can share something. Mortenson’s bridge to Korphe spanned more that the gorge beneath it; it spanned warring cultures, and his work suggests that perhaps the war on terror is not won by bullets, but rather by love, education, and a shared cup. I was left to wonder, if Greg Mortenson, with his inept ways, can make a difference in the world, what can I do?
One group of American school children raised 62,345 pennies for Mortenson’s efforts. That’s enough money to buy two or three nice ipods, or 5% of the cost of a school for the children of Pakistan.
It is a book worth reading.
Visit threecupsoftea.com, gregmortenson.com, the Central Asia Institute, and Pennies for Peace for more information on the book and how you can help in Pakistan.
What did you think of Three Cups of Tea?
Other Reviews:
If you have reviewed Three Cups of Tea on your blog, leave a link in the comments and I’ll add it here.
For the rest of October, I’ll donate 10 cents to World Food Programme for every (non-spam) comment I receive on any post of Rebecca Reads. See most post on Blog Action Day 2008 here. I’m also donating any proceeds (4%) from my Amazon Store.
I’m giving away books! Visit here to enter the contest.
<< Previous Post Stories by Edgar Allan Poe
The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood Next Post >>
This blog is a collection of my thoughts about books and reading and reviews of books I've read. I'd love to hear your thoughts, too. Please share!
From October 2008-July 2009, I'm hosting the Really Old Classics Challenge.
I'm also hosting the quarterly Martel-Harper Challenge.
Further, as an ongoing personal challenge, I'm reading all the works on the How to Read and Why reading list compiled by Harold Bloom. I'd love for you to either join me in this challenge or to follow along with me as I try to learn to read well.
Dawn - She Is Too Fond Of Books
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 10:34 am
I love the point/counterpoint format. Lisa at Minds Alive on the Shelves had suggested we do that with *The Necklace* (I didn’t like it, she did). Thanks to your mother for guest blogging with you.
I did not enjoy *Three Cups of Tea*, much for the same reasons as you - poor writing and a “memoir” in the third person (?). A good idea, poorly executed. My review is here:
http://www.sheistoofondofbooks.com/?p=115
Jupiter
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 11:36 am
I love the different perspectives. Both of the reviews were so well written,I don’t know which one I want to believe more!
Amanda
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 11:36 am
Interesting. I, too, am not a fan of the memoire-in-third-person trick, and if the writing in this is as bad as you mention, I’m afraid I’d probably be too distracted by it to enjoy the story itself. However, one of our group members on 5-squared read this and loved it. Her review is at http://5-squared.blogspot.com/2008/08/three-cups-of-tea.html. I suppose it all depends on how you read and what you read for. I like your hate/love format.
Jessica
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 1:43 pm
What a great post! I think you and your mom represent the spectrum of critiques on this book. My book club read this earlier this year. Most of them leaned toward liking it, while I decidedly did not like it. That is part of what I like about books - the discussion. My review contains quotes of my favorite atrocious sentences: http://thebluestockings.com/2008/03/three-cups-of-tea-part-ii/
Leena
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 8:42 pm
something tells me I’d like the book since I think I’d be more concerned with his experience than the writing
Christina
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 9:03 pm
Our reasons are pretty on par but I never thought of doing something like this. My mom loved Three Cups of Tea, which, as you saw, I didn’t.
Rebecca Reid
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 9:09 pm
Dawn, yes, maybe if it gets rewritten some day I’d recommend it more!
Jupiter, I’m glad! That was my point in doing it that way.
Amanda, I have a hard time considering this a memoir: I’d call it a journalistic report before I’d call it a memoir. Which is why I thought the girl friend dumping him thing was way off-balance. But, obviously people get past the writing style, so, I’m not the one to say “it’s trash!”
Jessica, and that is why it’s so hard to “recommend” books — especially if they don’t intend to discuss it with you afterwards. I always feel bad if they hate it!
Leena, oh good! I’m glad you might still give it a try then!
Rebecca Reid
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 9:22 pm
Christina, As you said in your review, I felt guilty for not liking it. At all. So I brought my mom in to make me feel better for posting my negative thoughts….
Teresa
Wednesday, October 22, 2008 at 9:00 pm
Love the point-counterpoint. I agree with you both on this one. I liked learning about Mortenson’s work, and I was even amused by his sometimes ridiculous efforts to raise money and get his act together. It’s a great story! But I really don’t think the story was told all that well. There were too many digressions, and a lot of points were belabored. A long article or a much shorter book would have been a better approach.
Natasha @ Maw Books
Thursday, October 23, 2008 at 10:16 pm
I love the idea of two different viewpoints! I read about 100 pages of this book and then had to return it to the library. A part of me wants to start reading it again and another part of me says that the writing style was too weird for me.
Rebecca Reid
Friday, October 24, 2008 at 10:52 am
Teresa, I agree about the digressions: at a certain point, I remember thinking “I don’t blame the girlfriend for dumping you! What took her so long?!”
Natasha, as you can see, it’s a mixed bag: some really weren’t bothered by the writing, but others were. It may be worth reading just for the discussion….who knows? I’d just suggest not listening to the 800+ minutes. That was really too much!
angela michelle
Friday, October 24, 2008 at 6:00 pm
I agree with both of you–the writing was pretty horrific. The whole thing is a pretty thinly veiled fundraising ploy.
But Mortensen’s transition from clueless drifter to successful activist is what intrigued me most. I’ve always wondered how normal people end up changing the world. I loved how the book tracked his roadblocks and efforts. And yes, he had MAJOR good luck! (Who couldn’t do something good with a deux ex machina-style donor?)
My blog post on the book is http://presseddownandshakentogether.blogspot.com/2008/01/three-cups-of-tea.html
Barbara Gibson
Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 4:41 am
Interesting! I enjoyed reading the two points of view. I got my book a couple of days before our book club was to meet. I read part of it and then listened to the review. After that, I really had no desire to finish the book. That was all I really wanted to know! Keep up the good work and do another dual review sometime.
Rebecca Reid
Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 9:14 pm
Barbara, I’m glad you liked the dual review. We liked it too! As for the book, yes, I think knowing the premise is kind of enough, which is too bad because I felt it could have been done better!