Thoughts about reading fiction, nonfiction, and children’s books, new and old
Children 2,000 years ago read and memorized Virgil and Homer, and Aesop’s Fables were common knowledge. Even 200 years ago these classics were widely read. Now, there are thousands of new books published each year. But what about those really old ones? Have we read those yet? Any of them?
That’s why I’ve decided to host the Really Old Classics Challenge (including classics from pre-1600s), a ten-month challenge (October 2008-July 2009). I myself haven’t read many of the really old ones (Homer, Virgil, Chaucer, Dante, etc.), so this is a project I’m adopting for myself primarily, in addition to my How to Read and Why personal challenge. But I thought we could all use a little motivation, a reminder, to pick one the old classics.
Also, I’m hosting the Bookworms Carnival in August 2009, and while I haven’t specified exactly what the subject for that will be, I’d like to make the theme somehow relate to classics.
So, what are Really Old Classics? I’ve compiled a list of some Really Old Classics that catch my eye, but of course, you could include anything that was written pre-1600 (pre-Shakespeare). In your own reading, you could also include works about those works, if you want (such as Edith Hamilton’s Mythology, which is about the Greek and Roman myths), although let’s not count Cliff’s Notes.
That’s it.
If you want, you can choose which Really Old Classics you want to read before you begin. Or, you can choose a few that you may later choose from. If you have a blog, you can review them as you read them.
If you want to sign up for the Really Old Classics challenge, leave a comment. You don’t need to have a blog to participate. If you’d like, you can tell us now how many Really Old Classics you’d like to read. Or you can write that on a specific post on your blog, a link to which you can leave in a comment here. We’d love to follow you as you reach your goals!
I will have another post where you can return and leave links to your reviews. Leaving a link to your review is optional. I personally like having links to everyone’s review in the same place so I can follow and compare, and I’d love to have yours here on Rebecca Reads. But if you don’t like doing that, don’t feel you must.
If you don’t have a blog, you can leave your reading progress and/or thoughts of the work on that post.
In the mean time, here’s a clever button for you to use, if you wish.
Happy Reading!
Related Posts on Rebecca Reads:<< Previous Post Banned Books Week
Really Old Classics Challenge Reviews Next Post >>
This blog is a collection of my thoughts about books and reading and reviews of books I've read. I'd love to hear your thoughts, too. Please share!
From October 2008-July 2009, I'm hosting the Really Old Classics Challenge.
Also, as an ongoing personal challenge, I'm reading all the works on the How to Read and Why reading list compiled by Harold Bloom. I'd love for you to either join me in this challenge or to follow along with me as I try to learn to read well.
Alessandra
Wednesday, October 1, 2008 at 12:42 pm
The challenge button is so cute I’m tempted to join.
Amanda
Wednesday, October 1, 2008 at 2:15 pm
I was in a class my freshman year of collage that combined freshman and sophomore english as well as a dose of humanities, and we focused on old classics for the most part. The first semester was everything pre-Dante, and the second semester was Dante onwards. With that, I had to read at least 11 or 12 of the ones from your list, along with tons of others from the Greek tragicomedy plays and some other philosophy works. I discovered that old classics just aren’t my favorites. A few of them I could get through, but the others just bored me to tears, unfortunately. From Dante forwards, though, I liked most of what we read. Needless to say, I enjoyed second semester more than the first.
Rebecca Reid
Wednesday, October 1, 2008 at 8:30 pm
Amanda, that is the exact reason I feel the need to read these: I never had such a class. Even my history of civilization class only read “excerpts” from a few things.
I’d be interested to know if there was anything pre-Dante that you didn’t hate *too much*.
Becky
Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 2:49 pm
I’ll think about this. I can’t promise anything right now though. I was actually planning on hosting a Centuries challenge (though I hadn’t published it yet) which would mesh rather well with this one if folks are so inclined. Most of the books on the list I’m planning to read are post 1600. (Don Quixote, Clarissa, Roxana, etc.) But there are one or two books that are pre 1600. I’d like to read The Divine Comedy eventually. And I’d love to read The Wycliffe New Testament and the Tyndale New Testament. I have in my notes (and granted this is from Wikipedia) that Don Quixote was published in two volumes, 1605 and 1615. Let me know if Don Quixote counts as a pre-1600 book though. If it does, I’ll probably sign up.
Rebecca Reid
Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 4:11 pm
Becky, I thought Don Quixote was published before 1600! Oops, I guess I shouldn’t have put it on my list. Well, define “really old classics” as you want. I think it would work, it sure is “really old” to me. The pre-1600 was just a guide to go by so we had some point of reference.
Jessica
Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 9:08 pm
Rebecca, what a great idea for a challenge. I really respect and admire your thoughtful blog.
Though I read many “really old classics” in college, I’ve been meaning to read more. For now I think I’ll commit myself to two books: The Odyssey, by Homer and Utopia, by Sir Thomas More. I’ll post about this challenge and my goals soon. Thanks for hosting!
Becky
Friday, October 3, 2008 at 11:12 am
Hi! I’m back to officially sign up. I’ll be counting Don Quixote, I hope that’s okay
My post is here.
Really Old Classics Challenge « Becky’s Challenges
Friday, October 3, 2008 at 11:14 am
[...] quite published yet. (You can get a sneak peek here.) This one is hosted by the fabulous Rebecca of Rebecca Reads. (Sign up on this post, post review links at this one.) The rules of this one are simple. Each [...]
Amanda
Friday, October 3, 2008 at 12:26 pm
Rebecca, there were a couple I liked. I remember enjoying Medea by Euripides and some of Plato’s dialogues. There was probably more than that, but it was 11 years ago so I don’t recall others offhand.
Chain Reader
Friday, October 3, 2008 at 2:46 pm
I’m in, even though I had decided not to join any challenges for a while. I know some of the “really old” ones can be boring sometimes, but I love getting a little piece of the past from them. My goal is to read 4, but I don’t know which ones, because I’ve learned since book blogging I am incapable of sticking with anything. I always change books, change order, read books that aren’t on any challenge, etc. No self-discipline!
Rebecca Reid
Saturday, October 4, 2008 at 7:49 am
Amanda, I actually have Medea, so I may have to read that one. Chain Reader, glad I tempted you!
Jessica
Tuesday, October 7, 2008 at 11:44 am
I’m joining up! Here’s my post:
http://thebluestockings.com/2008/10/really-old-classics-challenge/
Thanks for hosting such a thoughtful challenge.
TUESDAY
Wednesday, October 8, 2008 at 4:40 am
Hi, I’d like to join too! I’m planning on reading six books:
The Canterbury Tales, Geoffrey Chaucer
Utopia, Sir Thomas More
The Divine Comedy, Dante
Aeneid, Virgil
Metamorphoses, Ovid
The Odyssey, Homer
http://tuesdayinsilhouette.wordpress.com/really-old-classics/
Really Old Classics Challenge « tuesday in silhouette
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 6:42 pm
[...] just dropped by Rebecca’s blog and someone there recommended Stanley Lombardo, so I’ll look out for his translation, if ever [...]
Marina
Wednesday, October 22, 2008 at 10:00 pm
I’m in, if only for an excuse to attempt Tale of Genji (my real-life classics book group won’t).
http://texasbookwoman.blogspot.com/2008/10/really-old-classics-challenge.html
Rebecca Reid
Friday, October 24, 2008 at 10:44 am
Marina, glad to hear it! I don’t know anything about Tale of Genji; I’m going to go look it up now!
angela michelle
Friday, October 24, 2008 at 6:06 pm
I recently tried reading Aesop’s fables to the kids (age 2-13) thinking they’d love them–and they really didn’t. I think they seemed too obtuse or something. Maybe I’ll give it another try.
Rebecca Reid
Saturday, October 25, 2008 at 7:34 am
angela michelle, I’ve been doing a lot of reading about Aesop lately, and I think enjoying Aesop’s depends a lot on translation and format — each translator has a different purpose in writing and creating their own work. Very interesting to compare versions!
Lynda
Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at 6:22 am
add me in please. my list is here:
here
Rebecca Reid
Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at 6:33 am
Lynda, great! (I fixed the link…)
Jeska
Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 12:02 pm
I would love to participate in this challenge. I have not yet picked my books, but I’m aiming for 29 (my age :P). I will be posting my reviews and status on my blog: http://jeskareads.blogspot.com with the label “really old classics challenge” !!
Rebecca Reid
Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 9:18 pm
Jeska, oh my! You are ambitious! Are you reading really old classics for a class? I thought I was ambitious with 6. I look forward to reading along on your blog!
By the way, I like what you already have over there! (I bet you could tell by my dozen comments….)
Jeska
Wednesday, November 12, 2008 at 1:36 am
yeah, I’m kind of over-challenging myself this year . . . we’ll see how it goes. And thanks for all the comments on the blog!
Paula
Sunday, November 16, 2008 at 3:20 pm
I’m going to try to read 5 really old classics that I already own and ought to read. If I finish early I might add a couple more.
Rebecca Reid
Monday, November 17, 2008 at 10:38 am
Paula, I look forward to hearing what you think of them!