17 Responses

  1. Becca
    Becca July 26, 2008 at 8:55 am | | Reply

    You’ve written an excellent review of this novel, which I read and studied rather extensively for my college senior thesis. The thesis was based on looking at women’s role in the history of American society as portrayed in American literaure. Since I was writing it in the late early 1980′s it was weighted on the side of feminism, and so I came down quite heavily on the societal limits to women’s freedom. I should go back and re-read this book again, with the perspecitve of 25 years, and see if my views have changed.

  2. Literate Housewife
    Literate Housewife July 26, 2008 at 10:09 am | | Reply

    I haven’t read the book, but I’ve seen the movie. Gillian Anderson sold me on it, but it was far from mirthful, too. I haven’t picked up the book mainly for that reason. It sounds like I’ve made the right choice. Great review. Like Becca said, I think you captured the essence of the novel. I really enjoyed your discussion about that Bible verse.

  3. Chris
    Chris July 26, 2008 at 11:13 am | | Reply

    While I sometimes felt sorry for Lily, I felt she made dumb decisions constantly. She also had a terrible sense of timing. I reviewed this one just last year. Not a happy book but I loved Wharton’s writing.

  4. Amanda
    Amanda July 26, 2008 at 12:47 pm | | Reply

    Hi Rebecca – I haven’t read this one yet but my classic lit book club is going to be reading this for our October selection. Honestly, I can’t say I’m looking forward to it. I can’t remember if we read Edith Wharton or just watched movies based on her books in high school, but I remember being very bored either way. The prose is supposed to be tough in this one, and it’s in a time period that I don’t often enjoy, so I’m leery but definitely willing to give it a try. i was really leery of Grapes of Wrath as well, and it turned out to be one of the best books I’ve ever read. So you never know, right? In the next couple months I should have my own review out for this one.
    -Amanda

  5. Diana Raab
    Diana Raab July 28, 2008 at 5:05 am | | Reply

    Hi Rebecca,

    Great book and great review.
    I think you might also be interested in my memoir, “Regina’s Closet: Finding My Grandmother’s Secret Journal,” which just won the 2008 Indie Award for Excellence in Memoir.

    It is a quick read and also highly recommended for book clubs as there is a Reader’s Guide available on-line.

    Cheers,
    Diana
    http://www.dianaraab.com

  6. Rebecca Reid
    Rebecca Reid July 28, 2008 at 6:47 am | | Reply

    @Becca: I like Age of Innocence so much better for the societal constraints, though. This one was more a balance between society’s constraints and Lily’s own foolish choices. At any rate, that sounds like an interesting thesis. I’ll bet reading the novel so many years after such intense study would be interesting.
    @Literate Housewife: I don’t usually read other reviews of books I’m about to review, but I did and saw the Bible verse. I hadn’t realized Wharton had taken her title from it, but I’m sure now she had!
    @Chris: yes, Lily was so dumb most of the time. If you love Wharton’s writing, I’d say give Age of Innocence a try. I loved that one and thought it was more beautiful than depressing….
    @Amanda: I guess I can see how the prose would be difficult, but at the same time, it’s not that bad. I wouldn’t say this is the best Wharton novel, though. But I’d be really interested in a group discussion about it. I hope the reading goes well for you!
    @Diana: thanks for the recommendation.

  7. Chain Reader
    Chain Reader July 28, 2008 at 2:52 pm | | Reply

    Great review! I love the satire of the title.
    I very much felt that Lily was a victim of her circumstances and that if she had been brought up in a different time or place, she would have been an intelligent, productive member of society. Her choices were so limited, that I think she couldn’t help but make stupid ones–she was trapped.

  8. Rebecca Reid
    Rebecca Reid July 29, 2008 at 9:29 am | | Reply

    @Chain Reader: I was torn between thinking Lily was stuck in her circumstance and thinking she should just stop being greedy and settle for shabbiness, as had Gerty Farrish. Did you think Gerty Farrish was similar to Lily, or was she a different social class? I guess I have a hard time understanding the repression of the time because “social class,” especially for single woman, isn’t the same anymore.

    I agree that it was just wonderful characterization! I loved that!

  9. Eva
    Eva August 7, 2008 at 11:48 pm | | Reply

    I read this maybe four years ago, but I remember thinking she was a fool. Her materialism didn’t really bother me, but I read Vanity Fair around the same time, so compared to Becky Sharp Lily was an angel, lol.

  10. Rebecca Reid
    Rebecca Reid August 8, 2008 at 2:58 pm | | Reply

    Eva, Yes, I thought she was pretty foolish, but I felt kind of torn. I haven’t read Vanity Fair, must do so….

  11. Amanda
    Amanda September 28, 2008 at 9:39 pm | | Reply

    Oddly enough, I didn’t catch the “playing cards” symbolism until I went back and re-read your review just now! I blame my complete ignorance on the sinus infection, haha. :) But seriously, that’s a really good parallel and theme that goes through there, I’ll definitely have to bring it up when we meet on the 11th.

  12. Rebecca Reid
    Rebecca Reid October 1, 2008 at 9:27 am | | Reply

    Amanda, lol! definitely the sinus infection! This would be an interesting one for a book club.

  13. How Far is the Ocean from Here, Amy Shearn | Words To Mouth

    [...] The House of Mirth, Edith Wharton  ~  “It is so wonderful. If you just want to spend a weekend at home weeping, I highly recommend it,” says Amy. [...]

  14. Averil Osborne
    Averil Osborne February 19, 2009 at 4:48 am | | Reply

    I have read The House of Mirth for an American Lit/History course I am doing. I agree with all the comments so far, I can only add that this book covers all aspects you can ever want in a book. Lily’s circumstances and her need to marry well. I don’t think she was materialistic really she needed to marry money to keep her standard of life. In those days society was all that mattered, for this class of people. All in all I think in life we have to look after ourselves. Lily did that.

  15. Rebecca Reid
    Rebecca Reid February 19, 2009 at 7:44 am | | Reply

    Averil Osborne, Well, but did she need to keep that standard of life? To me, she was expecting too much and living the high life when she was no longer in that social class. She should have adjusted, even if it was hard for her to do. I thought she was wasting her money foolishly.

    It seems you really liked this book! Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

  16. Vartika
    Vartika December 31, 2010 at 12:52 am | | Reply

    I think that just viewing Lily as a foolish woman is a rather narrow interpretation. While the individual cannot be absolved of culpability for his/her actions, it is also true that Lily is a product of her environment and upbringing that have shaped her views on what to expect from life and how to acquire it. In that respect she is a prisoner to the mores of her class and the times. Could a woman of stronger will and character have defied these and avoided Lily’s follies? Absolutely. Lily does lack these qualities. However, she (at least subconsciously) is never fully subservient to the social mores she lives by (in fact, if she had, she might have ended up getting married to Percy Gryce or some other such suitor and been a *success* as per the superficial definitions of her circle); this is indeed the redeeming quality that (in my opinion) elevates her character to that of a true tragic heroine. As Carry Fisher puts it:

    “That’s Lily all over, you know: she works like a slave preparing the ground and sowing her seed; but the day she ought to be reaping the harvest she over-sleeps herself or goes off on a picnic.”
    Mrs. Fisher paused and looked reflectively at the deep shimmer of sea between the cactus-flowers. “Sometimes,” she added, “I think it’s just flightiness–and sometimes I think it’s because, at heart, she despises the things she’s trying for. And it’s the difficulty of deciding that makes her such an interesting study.”

    1. Rebecca Reid
      Rebecca Reid January 12, 2011 at 4:00 pm | | Reply

      Vartika, It’s been a few years since I’ve read this book: sounds like I really need to revisit it! Thanks for stopping by!

I would love to hear your thoughts; please feel free to share them with me! However, please note that as the blog owner, I have the right to remove any comment that is off topic, defamatory, obscene, or abusive, or that uses language that is not family friendly. If you would like further clarification, please read the comments policy.

Leave a Reply

Advertisement