Thoughts about reading fiction, nonfiction, and children’s books, new and old
In his stories, Vladimir Nabokov so perfectly captures a character, or a setting, or an emotion, that I feel that the character is real, the setting surrounds me, and the emotion is my own.
His writing in these stories is so well done that I, a very amateur writer, feel the urge to try my hand at capturing the images around me, a task I will surely fail because I know I will never even remotely measure up to Nabokov’s incredible talent.
The unfortunate aspect of reading more than 60 of Nabokov’s short stories in one month is that the characters he so adroitly creates, the settings he so carefully draws, and the feelings he so perfectly captures are, for the most part, miserable, gloomy, and ultimately depressing. Also, some of his stories have fantastical elements that failed to resonate with me, and most dwell on negative aspects of human nature - subjects that weren’t pleasant for reading in bulk.
But I feel that the overall quality of Vladimir Nabokov’s writing is so extraordinary that he should be read simply for the marvelous experience that comes from reading his words, even if the reader doesn’t necessarily consider the negative underlying themes amazing.
Unlike the concise Ernest Hemingway, Nabokov uses many words to write his poetic stories. Some paragraphs are longer than a page; sentences are five lines long. It’s very dense, but, to me, beautiful.
Through his wordiness, Nabokov carefully creates a scene, as did James Joyce, and the scene seems to be imperative to many of his stories. Also like Joyce, Nabokov’s purpose or theme for each story isn’t revealed until the end. While Joyce’s stories often left me confused (revealing my ignorance, I suppose), Nabokov’s left me depressed. Sometimes the abrupt endings are a sort of epiphany and sometimes they are just the result of the character’s actions, and we, the readers, must determine Nabokov’s aim.
In that way, Nabokov’s writing reminded me of Anton Chekhov’s stories. Both authors seemed to describe every-day people (peasants in Russia for Chekhov; poor Russian émigrés living in Berlin for Nabokov) living their lives, with a sudden realization (either for the character or the reader) in the last moments of the story illustrate the depressing state of human nature, life, and relationships.
Guy de Maupassant also wrote about the dirty side of human nature. But, while Maupassant’s stories ended up being funny, Nabokov’s stories rarely had humor (although I may have missed any high-brow humor). Some of the stories with fantastic elements reminded me of Edgar Allan Poe’s or Washington Irving’s stories. (In fact, one story appropriately refers to Rip Van Winkle.)
In the end, Nabokov has a style completely his own. Just as I felt after reading Flannery O’Connor’s stories, I can’t place his style and themes into a category with any other short story writer.
As I mentioned, Nabokov’s stories tend to be rather sad. My two favorite stories happened to be the least unpleasant. A number of other stories have also stayed with me.
In “First Love,” a man reflects on his first love. In the course of his description of a childhood summer’s events, it’s unclear to the reader whether his first love was traveling by overnight train; swimming at the beach; learning about butterflies; or meeting the little French girl, Colette. This story doesn’t have much plot or grand finale, but it is a beautiful story that I’ve already reread three times.
“The Vane Sisters” was the story that Harold Bloom recommended in his How to Read and Why book list. In this story, a man reflects on his relationships with two sisters, one of whom was once his girlfriend. It also is incredibly subtle. (Highlight to read spoiler.) Nabokov’s subtle ending tells us that this man’s life really hasn’t been all that affected by the life and then the death of these sisters. It’s kind of depressing for the sisters, but an interesting realization for the man. It made me think about my own life and relationships. What impact do certain people have on me? For example, how often do I think about old boyfriends? Did they really impact my life significantly?
While I can only see myself rereading those two stories, there are a number of other stories that I keep remembering, even after starting the next story. Note that I do think Nabokov’s writing improved through the years; if you read the 60+ story volume as I did, start in the middle or go backward.
Here are some that stayed with me, with short introductions.
Have I made myself clear? Maybe not. To be safe, here it is as clearly as I can write it:
Read Nabokov’s short stories, at least one or two. His writing is incredible.
Have you read already read Nabokov’s stories? What did you think? How would you describe his writing style and the themes he writes about?
Note: Because Vladimir Nabokov’s stories are not in the public domain, I cannot link to them online. Here is Wikipedia’s information about him.
<< Previous Post A Ruined Author?
Caldecott Corner: Mo Willems Next Post >>
This blog is a collection of my thoughts about books and reading and reviews of books I've read. I'd love to hear your thoughts, too. Please share!
From October 2008-July 2009, I'm hosting the Really Old Classics Challenge.
I'm also hosting the quarterly Martel-Harper Challenge.
Further, as an ongoing personal challenge, I'm reading all the works on the How to Read and Why reading list compiled by Harold Bloom. I'd love for you to either join me in this challenge or to follow along with me as I try to learn to read well.
Amanda
Saturday, November 22, 2008 at 7:23 pm
I need to get ahold of his short stories!
Rebecca Reid
Saturday, November 22, 2008 at 7:58 pm
Amanda, the book cover is a link to the Amazon paperback
but of course the library is always a better option. (except, with 650+ pages, I had to try to scramble to get it read before it was due…)
Melody
Saturday, November 22, 2008 at 9:58 pm
Thanks for the great post, Rebecca! I’ll definitely check out his other works after reading Lolita.
Rebecca Reid
Sunday, November 23, 2008 at 4:24 pm
Melody, I think I’m just about convinced to give Lolita a read. Thanks for your review…
Myrthe
Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 6:52 am
My parents have one of Nabokov’s novels on their shelves (not Lolita, but I don’t remember which one) and for a long time I have been tempted to pick it up. Always I was a bit hesitant because of Nabokov’s “one famous work”. This post and your other one on Nabokov and the many great reviews of Lolita on other blogs are very much on the way to convincing me to pick up one of his works. I might even read Lolita. The power of bookbloggers!!
But, like you say, the guy wrote so much more than just Lolita, that I would like to read something else by him as well.
Thanks so much for this review, Rebecca!
Eva
Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 8:44 pm
I love Nabokov’s writing as well.
Rebecca Reid
Sunday, November 30, 2008 at 8:53 pm
Myrthe, bloggers have been pretty influential on my reading choices! His stories really are great!
Eva, glad to hear you also like Nabokov’s writing. (Long time, no see! Thanks for your comment and welcome back to the blogging world.)